+- CFEW Forums (https://forum.cfew.us)
+-- Forum: Minecraft (https://forum.cfew.us/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Suggestions & Feedback (https://forum.cfew.us/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: /region revisions (/showthread.php?tid=297)
Pages:
1
2
RE: /region revisions - shppthwhtfx - 04-18-2012
I have seen a server that allowed zone owners to use /region addmember and /region removemember and there were no abuses of it. The only potential abuse I can think of is when someone gets into a partnership, the partner puts all their valuables in the zone and then the owner removes them and claims all the valuables. Though from what aeon has said in the original post, they wont have removemember so that wont be a problem. I also didn't see aeon mentioning the ability to create zones being given to normal members, which is good. That means the only ones with large zones will be the ones we give them to, meaning that bot griefing scenario will only be to the large zone we already gave away. /region addmember g: doesnt work anyway, that concern is mute as well. I suggest not having members as owners of pvp flagged zones, that will fix that concern.
@james I suggest not giving them removemember, for the scenario I addressed above.
@war I suggest against giving them the ability to make zones and warps (even T6+), it can be a cause of major griefing.
@peng this is true that it's easy, but addmember can't be used for anything grief related unless they're griefing themselves or are hacked... which they probably have better things to worry about.
anyway, I am for giving zone owners /region addmember. Related to this, we need to either fix the issue with groups being added and change all the zones to have the groups as members so anyone in the groups cant add random people of lower rank or delete the group regulated zones because they're useless now.