08-20-2012, 04:46 AM
I think a talk with both of them would be a good start. See what crispy's story is, see what straven wants done about it. If crispy took it but gives it back and repairs the damage a warning should work well enough. If straven doesn't really want crispy banned (because of friendship or whatever) then again, warning is good.
Right now we just know the glass was broken by crispy and he looks like a very likely suspect. It wasn't a gigantic grief but if crispy can't repair the grief then even if he didn't click the egg, he's responsible for its exposure, so a tempban would be appropriate. Some would say a few days... others a week, it's all case by case =) decisions can be appealed if others get interested.
Right now we just know the glass was broken by crispy and he looks like a very likely suspect. It wasn't a gigantic grief but if crispy can't repair the grief then even if he didn't click the egg, he's responsible for its exposure, so a tempban would be appropriate. Some would say a few days... others a week, it's all case by case =) decisions can be appealed if others get interested.
I like ducks
., ／l、
ﾞ（ﾟ､ ｡` ７
. l、ﾞ ~ヽ
. じしf_,)ノ
Those who fight for justice must walk a narrow path, for those who complain about the injustice of the world usually end up being the ones committing those injustices later on.
., ／l、
ﾞ（ﾟ､ ｡` ７
. l、ﾞ ~ヽ
. じしf_,)ノ
Those who fight for justice must walk a narrow path, for those who complain about the injustice of the world usually end up being the ones committing those injustices later on.